Development Goals

developmentgoals.org

Tracking the eight goals
since 2001

Malnutrition and Hunger

Goal 1Figures published c. 2005 by the World Bank. The Millennium Development Goals program concluded in 2015; this site is preserved as a historical record.

The Millennium Development Goals call for reducing the proportion of people living on less than $1 a day to half the 1990 level by 2015 – from 27.9 percent of all people in low and middle income economies to 14.0 percent. The Goals also call for halving the proportion of people who suffer from hunger between 1990 and 2015. If projected growth remains on track, global poverty rates will fall to 12.7 percent – less than half the 1990 level – and 363 million more people will avert extreme poverty. And while poverty would not be eradicated, that would bring us much closer to the day when we can say that all the world's people have at least the bare minimum to eat and clothe themselves. Progress in eradicating hunger, on the other hand, has been slow and the situation has been worsening in some regions.

Target 1 Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day. Target 2 Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger.

Target 1 Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day. Regional charts on poverty incidence Table on proportion of people living on less than $1 a day

Poverty level down since 1990, but progress is uneven

There were at least 118 million fewer people living in extreme poverty at the decade’s end than at its beginning. And if projected growth remains on track, global poverty rates will fall to 12.5 percent – less than half the 1990 level – and 366 million more people will avert extreme poverty. But rapid progress in Asia and a return to pre-transition poverty levels in Europe and Central Asia will do nothing to alleviate the crushing burden of poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa, where more than 314 million people will continue to live on less than $1 a day.

Progress toward the poverty goal and projections to 2015

Over the last decade, poverty rates have declined in many regions, except for Europe and Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa. The greatest number of poor people live in South Asia, but the proportion of poor is highest in Sub-Saharan Africa, where slow economic growth has left millions at the margins of survival.

Per capita consumption of $1 a day

represents a minimum standard of living, yet more than a billion people live on less. In middle-income economies a poverty line of $2 is closer to the practical minimum. In 2001 an estimated 2.73 billion people were living on less than $2 a day – more than half population in the developing world. The numbers living on less than $2 a day will continue to rise in the Middle East and North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa. Improvements will be greatest in East Asia and Pacific. But by 2015, if present trends continue, the poverty rate measured at this higher line will have fallen by no more than 20 percent from its 1990 level.

Measurement note: A poverty headcount shows how many people fall below a poverty line. The poverty gap ratio also measures how far their incomes or consumption fall below it. The worked examples on that page apply the distinction to medicine affordability, including semaglutide and tirzepatide costs.

Target 2 Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger.

Chart on proportion of people consuming too little food

Malnutrition plays a role in more than half of all child deaths. Malnutrition in children is caused by consuming too little food energy to meet the body's needs. Adding to the problem are diets that lack essential nutrients, illnesses that deplete those nutrients, and undernourished mothers who give birth to underweight children. Raising incomes and reducing poverty is part of the answer. But even poor countries need not suffer high rates of child malnutrition. They can make big improvements through such low-cost measures as nutrition education and micronutrient supplement and fortification. Other things that help include improving the status and education of women, increasing government commitment to health and nutrition, and developing an effective health infrastructure.

Current context: Malnutrition includes both too little food and poor nutrition at higher body weights. The double burden of malnutrition explains how undernutrition can coexist with obesity and diet-related disease. The WHO definition of malnutrition includes these forms; the historical hunger figures above cover only part of that wider burden.

Child malnutrition levels in the first and the second half of the 1990s

Prevalence rates of underweight children have been falling in most regions, but too slowly to achieve the 2015 target, and in many regions the number of hungry people continues to grow. By 2001, only the East Asia and Pacific and Latin America and the Caribbean regions had fewer undernourished people than 10 years earlier. For prevalence rates of underweight children, progress have been fastest in East Asia and the Pacific, where child malnutrition rates declined by 33 percent, and South Asia, where rates declined 25 percent. Undernutrition also raises infection risk, and it is recorded as an underlying cause in a large share of child deaths from infectious disease. But many countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, lag behind.

Change in the proportion of population consuming too little food to maintain normal level of activity

Since 1990-92 the number of undernourished people in developing countries has fallen by 20 million, and the prevalence of undernourishment by 3 percentage points. Regional trends show the greatest progress in East Asia and Pacific, but the rates of malnutrition remain high in South Asia, and they are rising in Sub-Saharan Africa

The eight goals

Same period, same baseline, same 2015 deadline

Note. Each line states the developing-region outcome for that goal’s headline indicator. The status word is the carrier of meaning; no meaning is held by color alone. Full definitions and revision policies sit on the goal pages themselves.